Get Your Personal
On-Air Report Here
 
  What's Hot | Search |  
Friday, September 28, 2007
Mike Gallagher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Shuster's stunt backfires
by Mike Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 

Two themes that have run through this broadcaster’s nearly-30 year career in talk radio have been: 1) why conservatives are drawn to talk radio; and 2) the obvious liberal bias in the mainstream news media.

It took a “journalist” like David Shuster this week on MSNBC to demonstrate why people are so sickened by the behavior of so-called objective members of the news media, resulting in the continual migration to talk radio as a way for people to become better informed and hear both sides of an issue.

The stunt that Shuster pulled was astoundingly vulgar and eventually backfired in stunning fashion. Filling in for Tucker Carlson, the bow-tied conservative, Shuster’s invited guest was a Republican Congresswoman from Tennessee, Rep. Marsha Blackburn. The announced topic was the ongoing outrage over the Moveon.Org ad in the New York Times that referred to General Petraeus as a traitor.

Shuster, a political reporter (not a talk show host) was evidently agitated by Rep. Blackburn’s measured and responsible condemnation of the vicious ad. In the middle of the interview, he suddenly decided to go for the jugular and attack her by using a brave, dead soldier as his weapon. “You represent a district in western Tennessee”, Shuster snarled. “What was the name of the last soldier from your district who was killed in Iraq?”

Now remember, the subject of the MSNBC segment had absolutely nothing to do with how knowledgeable an elected representative was about the name of the most recent war casualty in her district. MSNBC invited her on to discuss the controversial Moveon.Org newspaper ad. Shuster knew the congresswoman likely wouldn’t know that name when he triumphantly crowed, “Ok, his name was Jeremy Bohannon. He was killed August the ninth, 2007. How come you didn’t know the name?” he demanded.

The only problem is that David Shuster didn’t know the name, either. It turns out he was flat wrong. Army Private Bohannon didn’t live in Rep. Blackburn’s district, he lived in a neighboring district represented by John Tanner, a Democrat.

Talk about karma. Occasionally, one of the bad guys gets exactly what he deserves. In David Shuster’s slimy effort to use a fallen soldier to try and make a decent conservative look bad on national TV, he embarrassed himself well beyond anything he managed to do to Congresswoman Blackburn.

It must be have been pretty painful for Shuster when he sheepishly appeared on a subsequent MSNBC show to make a public apology for his asinine behavior. “I identified who I believed to be that fallen soldier, a Tennessean killed in Iraq last month. But according to Pentagon documents, that young man came from a town inside a neighboring district…and for that, I apologize for that mistake”, Shuster said.

What a jerk.

I was told that prior to his public apology, Shuster went on a liberal talk radio show and he and the host were chortling and guffawing together over the “gotcha” interview he conducted with Rep. Blackburn. It wouldn’t surprise me one bit. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mike Gallagher is a nationally syndicated radio host, Fox News Channel contributor and guest host and author of Surrounded by Idiots: Fighting Liberal Lunacy in America.

Be the first to read Mike Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Robert
Perhaps you would rather continue the discussion about the APQ-13 here.

My experience is with the equipment as a weather radar and it did quite well, but had limitations. Its operation frequency (I am basing these on memory from over 40 years ago) of about 9300 megahertz gave a wave length that was very good for light to medium precipitation (rain or snow) but with heavy precipitation or very large storm systems would not show the back side of the system. The result could be a big blob in the middle of the screen.

The APQ-13 could not indicate cloud heights which is an important piece of information for forecasters. The reason it could not was because, certainly in the weather version, there was no provision for a vertical scan of the antenna. Also because of the antenna shape, its transmissions were narrowly focused as a beam and if that same antenna were used, would limit its capabilities in navigation and bombing accuracy.

On the KC-135, the radar system had a dual antenna system, one that transmitted a narrow beam and another which essentially transmitted a horizontally narrow and wide vertical band. The second one was used in navigation and was much more effective than the beam transmissions which were used primarily during air refueling rendezvous operations.

Clyde9

Sidetracks and tangents
All of this obscures the fact that Petraeus is a criminal and a liar with no honor and no credibility who disgraces the uniform he wears and has no business sitting in front of Congress when he should be sitting in a prison cell. Why don't we talk about that?
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.